Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 contains rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure. These rules provide a framework for employers to reduce their workforce due to economic or other reasons, while also providing protection to workers against arbitrary or unjustified termination.
Lay-off refers to the temporary suspension of employment of a worker by the employer for a certain period due to lack of work or other reasons. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act defines Lay-off as the failure, refusal or inability of an employer on account of shortage of coal, power or raw materials or the accumulation of stocks or the break-down of machinery or natural calamity or for any other connected reason to give employment to a workman whose name is borne on the muster rolls of his industrial establishment and who has not been retrenched.
Section 25C of the Act provides that when a worker is laid off, he is entitled to be paid compensation by the employer, equivalent to fifty per cent of the total basic wages and dearness allowance, if any, for the period of the lay-off. This compensation is payable only if the worker has completed at least one year of continuous service.
Retrenchment refers to the termination of the employment of a worker by the employer for any reason other than disciplinary action. Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act defines retrenchment as the termination by the employer of the service of a workman for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action, but does not include voluntary retirement of the workman or retirement of the workman on reaching the age of superannuation if the contract of employment between the employer and the workman concerned contains a stipulation in that behalf.
Section 25F of the Act provides that a worker cannot be retrenched unless the employer has given the worker one month's notice in writing, or has paid him wages in lieu of such notice. In addition, the employer must pay the worker compensation equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months.
Closure refers to the permanent cessation of an undertaking by the employer. Section 2(o) of the Industrial Disputes Act defines closure as the permanent closing down of an undertaking. The rules related to closure apply to establishments with more than 100 workers.
Section 25FF of the Act provides that an employer cannot close down an undertaking without giving notice in writing to the appropriate government, at least 60 days before the proposed date of closure. In addition, the employer must pay compensation to the workers, equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed year of continuous service or any part thereof in excess of six months.
The rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure contained in Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act provide a framework for employers to reduce their workforce due to economic or other reasons, while also providing protection to workers against arbitrary or unjustified termination. These rules aim to balance the interests of workers and employers, and to ensure that workers are not unfairly impacted by changes in the economic environment or other factors beyond their control.
It is important to note that these rules apply to all establishments, whether in the public or private sector. They aim to provide a level playing field for all workers, regardless of their employer's ownership structure or sector.
The rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure have evolved over time in response to changing economic and social conditions in India. In 1976, the Indian government introduced the Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, which made significant changes to the rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure.
One of the major changes introduced by the 1976 amendment was the requirement for employers to obtain prior permission from the appropriate government before laying off or retrenching workers. This requirement was intended to provide a mechanism for the government to monitor and regulate the process of Lay-off and Retrenchment, and to ensure that workers' rights were protected.
In addition to the requirement for prior permission, the 1976 amendment also introduced new provisions related to the payment of compensation to workers who were laid off or retrenched. These provisions required employers to pay compensation equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed year of continuous service, in addition to providing notice or wages in lieu of notice.
However, the 1976 amendment also faced criticism from some quarters, who argued that it made it difficult for employers to respond to changing economic conditions and to remain competitive in the global market. In response to these criticisms, the Indian government introduced further amendments to the Industrial Disputes Act in 1982 and 1984, which relaxed some of the restrictions introduced by the 1976 amendment.
The 1982 amendment, for example, removed the requirement for employers to obtain prior permission before laying off or retrenching workers in establishments with less than 300 workers. The 1984 amendment further relaxed these restrictions by increasing the threshold for establishments requiring prior permission to lay off or retrench workers to 1,000 workers.
Despite these amendments, the rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure remain an important part of India's labor laws. They provide a framework for employers to reduce their workforce due to economic or other reasons, while also ensuring that workers' rights are protected.
It is important to note that these rules apply to all workers, regardless of their employment status or nature of work. They apply equally to permanent, temporary, or contract workers, and to workers in both the formal and informal sectors.
In conclusion, the rules related to Lay-off, Retrenchment, and Closure contained in Chapter V-A of the Industrial Disputes Act provide an important framework for employers and workers in India. These rules have evolved over time in response to changing economic and social conditions, and aim to balance the interests of workers and employers. While there have been criticisms of these rules, they remain an important part of India's labor laws, and are essential for protecting workers' rights in a rapidly changing economic environment.
Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)
0 Comments
Please do not enter any Spam link in the comment box