Purchasing Power Parity (PPP):
1. Introduction: Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is an economic concept that seeks to explain the equilibrium exchange rate between two currencies based on their relative purchasing power. It suggests that in the long run, the exchange rate between two currencies should adjust to equalize the price levels of a representative basket of goods and services in both countries. In other words, PPP implies that a given amount of money should have the same purchasing power in different countries.
2. Absolute PPP: Absolute PPP is the simplest form of purchasing power parity, stating that the exchange rate between two currencies should be equal to the ratio of the price levels of a representative basket of goods and services in each country. Mathematically, it can be represented as:
Exchange Rate (E) = Price Level in Foreign Country (Pf) / Price Level in Home Country (Ph)
Where: E = Exchange Rate (units of home currency per unit of foreign currency) Pf = Price Level in the foreign country Ph = Price Level in the home country
For example, if the price level in the United States is twice that of Japan, according to absolute PPP, the exchange rate between the US dollar and the Japanese yen should be 1:2.
3. Relative PPP: Relative PPP introduces the idea that the change in the exchange rate over time is related to the difference in the inflation rates between two countries. It suggests that the percentage change in the exchange rate should be equal to the difference in the inflation rates of the two countries. Mathematically, it can be represented as:
% Change in Exchange Rate = Inflation Rate in Home Country - Inflation Rate in Foreign Country
For example, if the inflation rate in the United States is 3% and in Japan is 1%, according to relative PPP, the US dollar should depreciate against the Japanese yen by approximately 2% to equalize the inflation differential.
4. Implications of PPP: The concept of purchasing power parity has several implications:
a. Exchange Rate Forecasting: PPP can be used as a tool for exchange rate forecasting, especially in the long run. If a country experiences higher inflation than its trading partners, its currency is expected to depreciate in accordance with PPP.
b. International Price Comparisons: PPP allows for meaningful international price comparisons. By converting prices of goods and services from one currency to another using PPP exchange rates, one can compare the cost of living or the relative affordability of products across countries.
c. Arbitrage Opportunities: Violations of PPP can create arbitrage opportunities for investors. If a currency is overvalued according to PPP, investors can buy goods and services in the undervalued currency, convert them to the overvalued currency at the market exchange rate, and profit from the price differential.
d. Long-Term Equilibrium: PPP suggests that exchange rates tend to move towards their equilibrium levels in the long run. However, in the short run, various factors such as speculative activities, capital flows, and changes in economic conditions can lead to deviations from PPP.
5. Limitations and Criticisms of PPP: While PPP is an essential economic concept, it has its limitations and may not always hold true in the real world. Some of the major limitations and criticisms of PPP include:
a. Assumption of Identical Goods: PPP assumes that the representative basket of goods and services used for comparison is identical across countries. In reality, there are differences in product quality, preferences, and availability that can affect relative prices.
b. Transport Costs and Trade Barriers: PPP does not consider transport costs, tariffs, and other trade barriers that can lead to price differences between countries, even if the goods are the same.
c. Non-Tradable Goods and Services: PPP does not account for non-tradable goods and services, such as housing, which can significantly influence price levels and distort PPP calculations.
d. Short-Term Volatility: PPP is more applicable in the long run and may not hold true in the short term due to various factors, including speculative activities and sudden changes in economic conditions.
e. Data Limitations: Accurate and consistent data on price levels and inflation rates in different countries can be challenging to obtain, affecting the reliability of PPP calculations.
Interest Rate Parity (IRP):
1. Introduction: Interest Rate Parity (IRP) is a financial concept that links the interest rates, spot exchange rate, and forward exchange rate of two currencies in a way that eliminates the possibility of arbitrage opportunities in the foreign exchange market. It is based on the principle that investors should earn the same return on their investments, regardless of whether they invest domestically or internationally after accounting for exchange rate movements.
2. Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP): Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP) is one of the two forms of interest rate parity. It involves the relationship between interest rates, the spot exchange rate, and the forward exchange rate when investors use forward contracts to cover their currency risk. CIRP is applicable when investors borrow or lend money in one currency, convert it into another currency, invest it in a foreign money market instrument, and simultaneously hedge their foreign exchange risk with a forward contract.
The formula for covered interest rate parity is as follows:
(F / S) = (1 + Rf) / (1 + Rh)
Where: F = Forward exchange rate (units of domestic currency per unit of foreign currency) S = Spot exchange rate (units of domestic currency per unit of foreign currency) Rf = Foreign interest rate Rh = Domestic interest rate
CIRP implies that if the forward exchange rate (F) is accurately priced, an investor cannot make arbitrage profits by borrowing in one currency, converting it to another, investing it, and then hedging the exchange rate risk with a forward contract.
3. Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIRP): Uncovered Interest Rate Parity (UIRP) is the other form of interest rate parity. It involves the relationship between interest rates and the expected spot exchange rate change. Unlike CIRP, UIRP assumes that investors do not use forward contracts to cover their currency risk.
The formula for uncovered interest rate parity is as follows:
E(S) = S * [(1 + Rf) / (1 + Rh)]
Where: E(S) = Expected future spot exchange rate S = Current spot exchange rate (units of domestic currency per unit of foreign currency) Rf = Foreign interest rate Rh = Domestic interest rate
UIRP suggests that the expected percentage change in the exchange rate (E(S) - S) should be equal to the interest rate differential between the two currencies (Rh - Rf). If interest rate differentials do not equal the expected exchange rate changes, arbitrage opportunities could arise, leading to adjustments in exchange rates.
4. Implications of IRP: The concept of Interest Rate Parity has several implications:
a. Forward Exchange Rates: Interest Rate Parity helps to determine the theoretical fair value of forward exchange rates based on interest rate differentials between two countries.
b. Currency Carry Trade: Carry trade is a strategy where investors borrow in a currency with a low-interest rate, convert it to a currency with a higher interest rate, invest it, and aim to profit from the interest rate differential. IRP plays a significant role in such strategies.
c. Exchange Rate Expectations: IRP can provide insights into market participants' expectations about future exchange rate movements, as derived from interest rate differentials.
d. Forex Market Efficiency: IRP plays a crucial role in ensuring that the foreign exchange market is efficient and free of arbitrage opportunities.
5. Limitations and Criticisms of IRP: While Interest Rate Parity is a fundamental concept in finance, it has its limitations and may not always hold true in the real world. Some of the major limitations and criticisms of IRP include:
a. Transaction Costs: IRP assumes frictionless markets without transaction costs. In reality, foreign exchange transactions may involve costs, such as bid-ask spreads and fees, which can impact the actual returns on investments.
b. Risk Premiums: IRP does not account for risk premiums that investors may demand for investing in different currencies, especially in countries with higher perceived risks.
c. Political and Economic Factors: IRP assumes that interest rate differentials are solely based on economic factors, but political events, economic indicators, and geopolitical developments can also influence exchange rates.
d. Capital Controls: In some cases, capital controls or government interventions in the foreign exchange market can distort the relationship between interest rates and exchange rates.
e. Short-Term Volatility: IRP is more applicable in the long run and may not hold true in the short term due to factors such as speculative activities and sudden changes in market conditions.
6. Relationship between PPP and IRP: Both Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) and Interest Rate Parity (IRP) are essential concepts in international finance. They share a fundamental similarity in that both seek to eliminate arbitrage opportunities in the foreign exchange market.
However, PPP and IRP are fundamentally different concepts, and their relationship is not straightforward. PPP focuses on the equilibrium exchange rate between two currencies based on their relative price levels, while IRP focuses on the relationship between interest rates and forward exchange rates or expected spot exchange rate changes.
The relationship between PPP and IRP can be understood as follows:
a. PPP Implications for IRP: If PPP holds true, it implies that the exchange rate should adjust to equalize price levels between two countries. If price levels are equalized, inflation differentials between the two countries would also be equalized, leading to the elimination of differences in nominal interest rates. Consequently, interest rate differentials would converge to zero, supporting the idea of Interest Rate Parity.
b. IRP Implications for PPP: IRP is more applicable in the short run and assumes that exchange rate changes are influenced by interest rate differentials. In this context, if IRP holds true, it suggests that exchange rate movements can be influenced by changes in interest rates. These changes in exchange rates can, in turn, affect relative price levels between countries, which aligns with the idea of Purchasing Power Parity.
c. Real and Nominal Exchange Rates: PPP focuses on the equilibrium exchange rate based on relative price levels, while IRP deals with nominal interest rates and exchange rates. Real exchange rates, which adjust for differences in price levels and are more closely related to PPP, are not explicitly considered in IRP.
d. Short-Term vs. Long-Term Considerations: While both PPP and IRP consider the long-term equilibrium state, IRP is more applicable in the short run, as it assumes investors can freely move capital and exploit interest rate differentials to profit from currency movements.
e. Deviations from PPP and IRP: In reality, deviations from both PPP and IRP can occur due to various factors, including market inefficiencies, government interventions, changes in expectations, and external shocks. These deviations can create arbitrage opportunities and influence short-term exchange rate movements.
In conclusion, PPP and IRP are essential concepts in international finance that aim to explain exchange rate movements and ensure that the foreign exchange market remains efficient and free of arbitrage opportunities. While they have different theoretical foundations, their relationship lies in their common goal of eliminating potential arbitrage profits in currency transactions. However, in practice, various factors can lead to deviations from both PPP and IRP, making exchange rate forecasting and investment decision-making complex tasks.
Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)
0 Comments
Please do not enter any Spam link in the comment box