How do the tribes represent the ‘other’? Discuss your views from the perspectives of Essentialism.

 The concept of ‘otherness’ is central to the way in which tribes are represented in contemporary discourse. As anthropologists and scholars have noted, tribes are often portrayed as exotic, primitive, and fundamentally different from ‘mainstream’ society. This portrayal is rooted in the idea of essentialism, which posits that certain groups of people possess inherent, unchanging characteristics that distinguish them from others.

Essentialism has a long history in anthropology and the social sciences. It emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries as a way of categorizing and classifying human populations. Essentialism posits that human beings are divided into discrete, fixed categories based on factors such as race, ethnicity, and culture. According to this perspective, these categories are characterized by essential, unchanging traits that define and distinguish them from other categories.

In the context of tribes, essentialism has been used to reinforce the idea that these societies are fundamentally different from mainstream society. This difference is often framed in terms of cultural practices, such as communal living, subsistence farming, and traditional belief systems. These practices are seen as exotic and primitive by mainstream society, and are often used to reinforce the idea that tribes are fundamentally ‘other’.

Essentialism has also been used to justify colonialism and the imposition of Western values and practices on indigenous societies. By portraying tribes as fundamentally different and primitive, colonial powers were able to justify their attempts to ‘civilize’ and ‘modernize’ these societies. This process often involved the imposition of Western systems of governance, law, and religion, as well as the suppression of traditional cultural practices and beliefs.

Today, essentialism continues to influence the way in which tribes are represented in popular culture and mainstream discourse. Despite efforts by indigenous peoples and their allies to challenge these representations, the idea of tribes as ‘other’ persists. This is evident in the way in which tribes are portrayed in films, television shows, and other media, as well as in the way in which they are discussed in political and academic contexts.

From my perspective, essentialism is a deeply problematic framework for understanding tribes and other marginalized groups. By positing that certain groups of people possess inherent, unchanging characteristics, essentialism ignores the complexity and diversity of human experience. It also reinforces stereotypes and biases that are used to justify discrimination, marginalization, and violence against these groups.

Instead, I believe that it is important to recognize the fluidity and dynamism of human identity and culture. This means acknowledging that cultural practices and beliefs are constantly evolving and adapting to changing social, economic, and political conditions. It also means recognizing that identity categories such as race, ethnicity, and culture are socially constructed and subject to change over time.

Ultimately, I believe that it is possible to move beyond essentialism and to create a more just and equitable world. This requires challenging the assumptions and biases that underpin our understanding of tribes and other marginalized groups, and recognizing the diversity and complexity of human experience. It also means centering the voices and perspectives of these groups, and working towards a more inclusive and compassionate society for all people.

Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)