Traditional budgeting mainly focuses on the amount of money an organisation or government department expects to spend. However, merely knowing how much money is spent does not indicate whether the expenditure has achieved its intended purpose. Programme and Performance Budgeting (PPB) was developed to connect financial resources with programmes, activities, objectives, and performance.
PPB is particularly important in public-sector organisations because governments need to demonstrate that public resources are being used effectively to achieve social and economic objectives.
Meaning of Programme and Performance Budgeting
Programme and Performance Budgeting combines two important ideas: programme budgeting and performance budgeting.
Programme budgeting classifies expenditure according to programmes designed to achieve specific objectives. Performance budgeting focuses on the results or outputs expected from those programmes.
Thus, PPB attempts to answer three major questions:
- What are the objectives?
- What programmes and resources are required to achieve them?
- What results or performance will be obtained from those resources?
For example, instead of simply allocating a budget to a health department, PPB may identify specific programmes such as disease prevention, maternal healthcare, vaccination, and rural healthcare, along with their expected outputs and outcomes.
Main Features of PPB
1. Objective Orientation
PPB begins with clearly defined objectives. Resources are allocated according to what the organisation intends to accomplish.
2. Programme Classification
Expenditure is organised around programmes and activities rather than merely administrative departments or accounting heads.
3. Performance Measurement
The system attempts to measure performance through outputs, outcomes, efficiency, and effectiveness.
4. Long-Term Perspective
PPB generally considers programmes over a longer period rather than focusing exclusively on a single financial year.
5. Resource Allocation
Financial resources are linked to programmes and expected results. This helps management assess whether resources are being allocated to priority activities.
6. Management Decision-Making
Performance information helps managers compare alternative programmes and decide where resources can generate greater benefits.
Process of PPB
The major stages of PPB include:
- Defining organisational objectives.
- Identifying programmes required to achieve those objectives.
- Determining the activities involved in each programme.
- Estimating the resources required.
- Establishing performance indicators.
- Preparing programme budgets.
- Measuring actual performance.
- Comparing actual results with planned objectives.
- Taking corrective action where necessary.
Advantages of PPB
1. Better Resource Allocation
PPB helps direct resources toward programmes that contribute most effectively to organisational or public objectives.
2. Focus on Results
It shifts attention from simply spending money to achieving measurable results.
3. Improved Accountability
Managers and public officials can be held accountable for the results achieved with the resources provided to them.
4. Better Planning
PPB encourages systematic and long-term planning by connecting objectives, programmes, resources, and expected outcomes.
5. Improved Decision-Making
Performance information helps managers evaluate alternative programmes and make more rational resource-allocation decisions.
6. Greater Transparency
The relationship between expenditure and results becomes clearer, which can improve transparency and public accountability.
Limitations of PPB
One major limitation is the difficulty of measuring performance, particularly for public services where outcomes may be qualitative or occur over a long period.
PPB can also require extensive information, analysis, and administrative effort. Establishing appropriate performance indicators can be difficult. In addition, external factors may influence results, making it difficult to determine whether performance is solely attributable to a particular programme.
There may also be political and organisational pressures that affect resource allocation even when performance information suggests another choice.
Conclusion
Programme and Performance Budgeting is a systematic approach that links objectives, programmes, resources, and performance. It attempts to ensure that expenditure is directed toward meaningful results rather than merely focusing on financial inputs.
Although PPB has limitations relating to measurement, information requirements, and implementation complexity, it provides an important framework for improving planning, accountability, resource allocation, and performance evaluation. It is especially useful in public administration, where effective use of limited public resources is essential.
Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)

0 Comments
Please do not enter any Spam link in the comment box