Fraud and Misrepresentation

 Fraud and misrepresentation are two types of misstatements that can occur in contract law. Although both involve false statements, they are different in their nature and effect. The following are the differences between fraud and misrepresentation:

• Fraud is an intentional misrepresentation of a material fact, made with the intention of inducing the other party to enter into a contract. On the other hand, misrepresentation is a false statement, made innocently or negligently, that induces the other party to enter into a contract.

• In fraud, the person making the misrepresentation knows that it is false or does not believe it to be true. In misrepresentation, the person making the statement does not know that it is false or believes it to be true.

• Fraud renders the contract voidable at the option of the party who was defrauded. The defrauded party may either rescind the contract or affirm it and claim damages. Misrepresentation renders the contract voidable at the option of the party who was misled. The misled party may rescind the contract and claim damages.

• In fraud, the person making the misrepresentation may be liable for damages and may also face criminal charges. In misrepresentation, the person making the statement is not liable for damages unless they acted negligently.

In conclusion, coercion and undue influence are different in their nature and effect, whereas fraud and misrepresentation are different in their intent and consequences. Coercion involves the use of force or threat to make a person enter into a contract, whereas undue influence involves the misuse of a position of trust or authority to influence the other party. Fraud involves an intentional misrepresentation of a material fact, whereas misrepresentation involves a false statement made innocently or negligently.

Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)