Understood very simply, equality of opportunity means the removal of all obstacles that prevent personal self-development. It means that careers should be open to talent and promotions should be based on abilities. Status, family connections, social background and other similar factors must not be allowed to intervene.
Equality of
opportunity is an extremely attractive idea that is concerned with what is
described as the starting point in life. The implication is that equality
requires that all individuals begin from a level playing field. However, the
consequences of this need not be egalitarian at all. Precisely because everyone
started equally, unequal outcomes are acceptable and legitimized. This
inequality would then be explained in terms of differing natural talents,
ability to work hard or even luck.
Constructed like
this, it seems that equality of opportunity provides an equal opportunity to
compete in a system that remains hierarchical. If so, then it does not appear
to be a substantially egalitarian principle. Equality of opportunity, thus,
points to an inegalitarian society, albeit based on the exalted ideal of merit.
This idea rests itself on the distinction between nature and convention, the
argument being that distinctions that emerge on the basis of different natural
qualities like talents, skills, hard work and so on are morally defensible.
However, differences that emerge out of conventions or socially created
differences like poverty, homelessness are not. The fact, however, is that it
is a specific societal predilection that makes a natural distinction like
beauty or intelligence a relevant ground for making distinctions in society.
Thus, we see that the distinction between nature and convention is not as
clear-cut as egalitarians imply.
Equality of opportunity
is institutionalized through the acceptance of keeping careers open to talents,
providing fair equal opportunity, and the many variations on the principle of
positive discrimination. All of these work to make the system of inequality
seem reasonable and acceptable. The underlying assumption is that so long as
the competition has been fair, advantage itself is beyond criticism. There is
no doubt that a system such as this would create people, who concentrate only
on their talents and individual attributes. This robs them of any feeling of
community with their people, because they can only think in terms of competing.
Perhaps, the only community this can create is a community of the successful on
the one hand, and a community of the unsuccessful on the other which blames
itself for its supposed failure. Yet another problem with equality of
opportunity is that it seeks to create an artificial disjunction between the
successes and failures of one generation and the next.
Subcribe on Youtube - IGNOU SERVICE
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
WhatsApp Us - 9113311883(Paid)

0 Comments
Please do not enter any Spam link in the comment box